There is always discussions in
the media about the accuracy of the movies that Hollywood
makes. At times the critics claim that the filmmaker altered that part from the
book or exaggerated this part from what had happened just to have better
impression on the audience.
I share my experience in that
regard:
1- Papillon - 1973.
Papillon has been always one of
my top favorites. I watched a censored version years ago in the old country
and then bought the book. Here I rented the DVD in 2006 when Blockbuster still existed
and eventually bought it a few months ago. What attracted me the most was not
only the great performance of Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman but also the efforts
that the real character of movie Henri Charriere made to free himself. After
all these year, the news is very disappointing: The story is completely
fabricated and Henri Charriere might have even been somebody else! There are
big questions in the movie as how he survived all of the miseries in all those
years. He survived two long-term solitary confinements, a two-year and a five-year(!) while his much
younger buddy almost died after the second one. He survived after visiting a leprous
colony, being shot at by guards several times, being shot by native Central
Americans using a Blow Gun and many more incidents. The funny thing is even the
author of the book, whose his identity is not confirmed, claims that 75% of the
story is true. So you can easily conclude that most of the stories in the book
and movie as well is nothing but what a prisoner who had nothing to do, has
made up! You know how boring could get in the prison, have nothing to do but
talking about nonsense! What if I make up stories and publish them after I got
out of here, he must have said to himself. I can make lots of money. Many books
actually are written in jail time. Hitler wrote his My Struggle when he was
doing time. The book is kind of forbidden in North America
and may be Europe and other countries as well and I
can't tell what he has written because I have not read it but it's a book.
Anyway I'm going far away. Hitler is the subject of the next movie!
Nevertheless it's very strong and touching movie.
2- Valkyrie - 2008.
Valkyrie is based on a failed
attempt to kill Hitler just less than a year before he commits suicide when Berlin
was surrounded. It's probably one of a few movies that there are as little exaggeration
as possible in their story. However in my opinion the movie could be much
longer than 01:50 hours. If it was
Oliver Stone who had made the movie, he would have made it longer for sure! Valkyrie
is a good movie overall and I enjoyed watching it. I guess Tom Cruise is the
only one whose act is a bit shaky! All the other actors which are mostly
British veteran ones, deliver excellent performances even the one who briefly
appears as Hitler. But the story, editing, music and direction takes over the
acts. I mean what makes the movie attractive is not only because Tom Cruise is
in it. It's everything else and most importantly it is true. Another thing
which could add to the value of the movie was having the actors and actresses
speaking German. As I said most of the main characters are portrayed by British
and Americans actors and actresses and there are a few Germans and other Europeans
as well. If the movie had been dubbed in German and had English captions, it
would have been much stronger in my opinion. The same I had with Das Boot. This
movie is available both in English and German and when I put it in German, it
just sound more natural, I would say.
3- The Shining - 1980.
This movie is probably one of the most controversial
ones, at least to my knowledge. It is based on one of the most famous
writers/novelists Stephen King's story of the same name but has been changed so much that it's almost
unrecognizable! King showed his dissatisfaction about the movie. Although it is
not based on a true story and doesn't require accuracy or inaccuracy but there
are parts in the movies which you practically don't understand what's going on!
Are does people ghosts or the main actor, Jack Nicholson, recalls memories? Nicholson,
by the way, delivers an awesome act. I almost didn't understand what Kubrick
wanted to say in this movie. Is that the same message that King wants to convey
or he is trying something different? I need to read a few reviews on that but
the movie is great, the direction, sound and music, acting and story except for
the scenes that ghosts-like creatures are seen. We know that Danny has this
power of seeing things in advance or seeing things which has happened before
and that's what the Black fella, the chef, who actually was a great actor
himself, calls Shining but even that explanation does not help to understand
what Jack sees because we know Jack does not have the Shining power. One of the
weirdest reviews I once saw (not read) about the movie was a clip in Youtube
which claims that The Shining is about the fake moon man landing by the US ! The narrator points at several signs which if put
together, in his opinion, show that Kubrick wanted to say the Apollo 11 Mission
was a hoax! So I don't know!
(Photo, top: The main characters of the failed attempt to kill Hitler in the summer before he commits suicide beside his wife, in Berlin. Von Stauffenbug, the Colonel who loses his right hand, left eye and two finders on the left hand is portrayed by Cruise)
(Photo, middle: One of the several strange scenes in The Shinning: Shelley Duvall, as Jack's wife, desperately looking for help, opens the door of one of the rooms and encounters this: a creature in a sort of bear suit and with an animal-like face is having oral sex with a man in a suit, looks like a hotel staff(!) What the hell does this mean?!)
(Photo, middle: One of the several strange scenes in The Shinning: Shelley Duvall, as Jack's wife, desperately looking for help, opens the door of one of the rooms and encounters this: a creature in a sort of bear suit and with an animal-like face is having oral sex with a man in a suit, looks like a hotel staff(!) What the hell does this mean?!)
No comments:
Post a Comment